Dear
Tracy / Sam
Following
to my last day email , please find in below some comments about last draft
documents LRIT .
If
possible for you , please refer it to relevant working group ( or in
plenary) for consideration and inform me about the results
Best
regards
Saeid Khorsandi
Senior expert of marine communication
Ports and shipping organization - Iran
GENERAL COMMENTS ( To Mr. SAM
RYAN ):
1- In order to do some arrangments between all working groups and also
have a same policy in common points , I suggest all working
group's chairmans have a meeting about the decisions at the end of each day .
For example in last meeting ( third Ad Hoc ) , there was two different
views in IDE-COMM and BILLING COSTING groups concerning the method of
transaction messages as a flag state and necessity for LRIT info From ships
associated with DC go out and back through IDE
2- In the last session ( third meeting ) output document of IDE-COMM
included some important comments which have been written in left side of each
paragraphs or tables , but in last draft document we couldn' t find any feed back
or result of these comments . Please inform all members about results of
discussion in these comments via the reflector.
OTHER COMMENTS
1- According to part 10.3 of performance standards the IDE have
continuous access to DDP . But in the system architecture figure in the
Performance Standards does not have an arrow linking the Data Distribution Plan
to the International LRIT Data Exchange . Also in figure 2 of draft
document for communication, there is a direct link between DDP and IDE . This matter should be considered in IDE
and DDP working groups.
2- About the access to information as a Port State , as far as you know a
Port State request is always triggered by a Notice of Arrival but who is responsible for sending the NOA
and how? For your information currently the format of NOA's are different
around the world and being issued by the agent of ships to the destination port
which the contracting government doesn't have any information about the ship
destination.
3- According to performance standards , ships as soon as passing any
country's sea borders ( for example port or coastal state borders) must
automatically be configured according to DDP via their DC .
How DCs are being informed , and find out their ships are
passing the countries geographical Sea borders ? Maybe ship born equipment
inform the DC but in this case the DDP should be installed in the ship's terminal
!!! If DC has discovered a match , in this case ships should be
configured in minimum interval for finding the exact time of border passing (
and the billing will be raised)
4- In last draft document of international data center :
a. In part 1.2.2.2 term " identification" must be changed to
" ship borne equipment
b. As have been written in this document "IDC operator" means the individual
responsible for the daily operation and maintenance of the International LRIT
Data Centre , but the
qualification of this operators and level of education should be considered by the
working group ( IDC group)
c. In part 1.2.3.2 term " the
present Performance standards" must be changed to "
the present technical spec."
d. Part 3.2.1.2 is not needed.