Randy,
Are you saying
you completely ignore Stop signs? Shame on you! J
Nah! While we tend
to read STOP as YIELD (legally not correct but neither is a rolling stop), we’re
prepared to stop if something’s coming. To be hit twice at the same
intersection means this guy, for whatever reason, was ignoring the sign
completely.
Glad to see
CKPS eventually issued the ticket to add insult to his bruised ego!
James.
From: ckcycle-bounces@lists.ncf.ca
[mailto:ckcycle-bounces@lists.ncf.ca] On Behalf Of randy.perdu@bell.ca
Sent: August 5, 2010 11:19 AM
To: ckcycle@lists.ncf.ca
Subject: [CKcycle] Anybody see this???.
From
Sent: August 4, 2010 11:28 AM
To: Perdu, C Randy (N167330)
Subject: Yikes, this could have been me ......
Shortly after 6:00 p.m. yesterday, a man riding a bicycle
failed to stop for a stop sign at the intersection of Selkirk Street and
Elizabeth Avenue in Chatham. While in the intersection, he was struck by a
vehicle that did not face a stop sign (this intersection is a two-way stop
– vehicles travelling Selkirk have to stop but vehicles travelling on
Elizabeth do not). The cyclist was not injured.
The cyclist, a 29-year-old Chatham man has been charged
with failing to stop for a stop sign.
The investigation revealed that the same cyclist had been
struck by a motorcycle at the same intersection on July 26, 2010. He attended
the Chatham-Kent Health Alliance to be treated for minor injuries. On that day,
he was charged with failing to stop for police to identify himself.
The Chatham-Kent Police reminds all cyclists that the
Highway Traffic Act defines a bicycle as a vehicle. Cyclists are therefore
required to obey all traffic laws just as drivers do.