Hey guys, I don't like to make these things any longer than they have to be, so I'll give you what you need to know.
I am in 3rd year Public Affairs and Policy Management. I have been on the executive since January, 2005, serving as Secretary-Treasurer and, with the position title changes of Annual General Meeting 2005, Vice-President Administration.
I'm seeking re-election for this position for a few reasons:
I) I want to still be involved with debate, and I think being on the exec is the best way to do it. VPAdmin is the position most suited to my tastes, and the best way I think I can contribute to the club.
II) I'm familiar with the system. When I first became Sec-Treas., there was little structure to speak of. I have developed a system that, albeit paper-based, has been more than sufficient to keep track of important numbers.
III) I want to make more changes. My platform this year is to convert all CUDS financial matters to electronic databases, allowing for easier access to and safer storage of data. This way, when I leave next year, the hand-over of power will be smooth and seamless.
That's the VPAdmin side of things.
_______________________________________________
I'd also like to run for one of the positions on the Tournament Selection Committee. I'm doing this essentially for one reason: I am an impartial and balanced member of CUDS, and so I'd like to use these qualities to ensure that the Selection process is as equitable as possible (we're all equal remember).
2.4 Vice President Internal, Garnett Genuis
Hello everyone:
As we approach CUDS Exec Elections, its platform time.
Relevant Experience
-I am currently CUDS VPX and a member of the TSC -I was president of my debate club in my final year of high school, and I did a lot of work on recruitment and retention
-I am currently a Rez Fellow, which gives me many of the necessary connections in residence to recruit for next year (note: I will not be a rez fellow next year) -I volunteer weekly at the Glebe Center, a home for the elderly. I have used my position there to organize a number of public debates at the Center
Platform
Broadly speaking, I see four main goals for the VPI. Recruitment, retention, public debates, and social events.
1. Recruitment
The objective of recruitment, as I see it, is to honestly present what debate is in as favourable a light as possible to as many students as possible. To do this, we need a presence at C&S Days, particularly those at the beginning of the year. This has been done fairly well in past. But we also need more of a presence in residence. I would like to get members of the club at as many floor meetings as possible at the beginning of next year. All rez fellows hold at least two meetings in the first month of school – and usually both are in the first two weeks. Making brief pitches about the debate club at those meetings could be a great way to give us the recruitment edge we need. Recruitment doesn't just happen at the beginning of the year, but it is obviously most successful then because September is when people are looking to fill their theoretical 'activities quota.' Once it's full, they are unlikely to join debate, even if they think it's cool.
Obviously it is important that we try to balance are gender numbers through recruitment. First of all, it's clear to me that the more recruitment we do, the less likely we are to have a skewed sample. If we only recruit 1 girl, then she's more likely to leave – but if we recruit 4 girls, they are less likely to feel out numbered and more likely to stay. I strongly support any initiatives to partner with EDS in order to increase the number of women at CUDS events. This seemed to be a big success for novice training day. Finally, despite our political differences, I have a very cordial working relationship with Ashley Hunkin, current Womyn's Center coordinator and CUSA's VPSS-elect. I would like to see if the Womyn's Center can help us with recruitment – they probably know of some outspoken and debative women on campus who they would be more than happy to send our way. As far as I understand the center, working constructively to remedy gender inequality is an important part of their mandate, and they would be more than happy to help us out.
2. Retention
Obviously, we will do better with retention if we recruit more. I think a certain degree of attrition is inevitable – people will join debate and then realize that it's not really for them or that they don't have the time. We should not regard every person who stops coming regularly as an indication of failure. At the same time, I think we need to look at better ways to easy people into debating. Right now, if someone has debated once, it is assumed that they are ready to debate. I would like to see more debate/discussion occur in a casual environment with people who don't appear ready to give a seven minutes speech cold turkey. For those who were at novice, we need more of 'the circle game' – essentially, round table discussions which encourage people to think like debaters without being put on the spot too much before they are ready.
This is potentially more of an issue for the TSC, but I would also like to see more pro-aming. Ideally, I would also like to see pro-am hybrid teams where we put a female novice from our club with a well-known female pro from another club, so that the novice can (a) make connections outside of CUDS which will make them want to go to more tournaments (b) identify a female role model in the debate world and (c) get pulled into higher rounds then they would otherwise be able to see.
3. Public Debates
Everyone says that public debates are needed. Even though it is not part of my position as VPX, I have organized 3 public debates already this year – 1 on campus and 2 off. Again, despite political differences, and I have a very good relationship with many people inside CUSA and am keen to partner with them when organizing events. We can and should obviously organize public debates on our own, but there are many advantages to working with CUSA when possible (potentially better venues, less organizational muscle required from our end, easier advertising, etc.).
I would like to have a public debate in September in residence this year in partnership with RRRA. Although I have yet to speak to the incoming executive about this, I think many of them would be very interested. (I have many contacts throughout the organization, given that I have regularly attended RRRA counsel meetings since October.)
Finally, I would to see us debating regularly at the Glebe Center. This is a good way for CUDS to give back to the community and for us to gain experience debating in front of people. Also, when we seek sponsorship for events such as Northams, volunteering in the community will potentially reflect very well on us.
4. Social Events
This is a relative no-brainer. CUDS should have a social atmosphere, and we need to include novices in that atmosphere as quickly as possible in order to help with retention. It's great that we go to Mike's Place often, and we should keep doing that – but not everybody is comfortable with the bar atmosphere and we should look at having other kinds of social events as well (bubble tea runs?). I will be getting a house near campus next year, and am happy to open it for debate social events at any time (provided that they aren't too debaucherious in nature).
2.5 Vice President Internal, Daniel Westlake
This is to announce my intention to run for VP Internal at this year's AGM. Posted below is my platform.
Experience:
I have been involved in debate in some fashion or another since I was in grade 9. In high school I served as President of my schools debate club and had an important role in recruitment. Working within a high school that had less of a reputation for debate, I have dealt with a number of challenges when it comes to getting people to come out to debate and keeping them within the club. I also spent two years in high school working on my school's yearbook, serving as head editor in my last year. Though this experienced I learned a vast amount about organizing a large project that requires a large amount of time and effort, but also tact for dealing with people who are involved in a variety of aspects of school life. At Carleton I have been involved in debating since the day I got here. I have attended a variety of tournaments including Nationals and Worlds, and have been responsible for organizing this year's Xerxes Cup high school tournament. I am committed to finding ways to bring new people into the club and to making sure that a variety of interests and personalities are not only accepted by the club but embraced by it.
Ideas:
Debate Bombing? This is a tactic stolen from the realm of swing dancing and the idea of Lindy Bombing. Essentially what it involves is finding high traffic areas at the beginning of the year and holding a number rounds, the idea being that people walking by will get to see what exactly debate is and will take a look at it. I think that this can compliment recruitment efforts such as the prelude table. While having a table is great, I believe that this will help the debate club to stand out from a lot of the other clubs that are on campus. I think that when people see what debate is, and that it can produce both interesting and entertaining ideas that they will become more attracted to the club.
Campus Presence. When we moderated the God debate we saw a couple of new people show up at our meetings directly after. I would look around campus to see what other opportunities there are for us to become involved in public debates across campus. I am committed to seeking to work with other clubs in order to foster a greater presence on campus. I have connections within many of the political clubs on campus and am an active member of the campus NDP. I think that club relations with these clubs can be built up and exploited so as to improve the club's image on campus. Not only do I think that this will help us become more visible on campus, but I believe that it will us help our abilities as debaters.
But I'm Already a Member of the Club. I think that this club by its nature is not simply a debate club but also a social club. I am a full supporter of the social activities that we have done regularly in the past. I have always advocated that the club look at developing a diversity of social activities as opposed to relying on the regular run to Mike's Place. Not that there's anything wrong with Mike's Place, but I think the club will benefit from catering to a variety of social interests. The dodge ball game at Dorchester showed that debaters do have in an interest in doing things other than the traditional social and I am committed to actively canvassing members to see what social events cub members are interested in. One of my central goals is to ensure that all members in the club feel welcome in whatever activities the club undertakes. I think that by diversifying club activities we will diversify club membership and develop a stronger club.
I hope that I can count on your vote on the 5th. Feel free to PM me, post, e-mail, talk to me, send smoke signals, or otherwise communicate any questions to me.
2.6 Vice President External, Blair Stein
Hey everyone! I want to run for the position of Vice President External for the 2007-2008 school year. I'm not entirely sure how this platform thing works, so someone please stop me if I'm doing this wrong...
Here is a little bit about me... I have been debating recreationally since the fifth grade (really!) and, although my high school didn't have a competitive team, I ran a recreational club where I organized some in-house mini-tournaments and a training day with another school. I also beat Ashbury once. It was awesome.
I'm a first-year Journalism student who has been very involved with CUDS this year. Not only did I serve as Novice Rep, but I was volunteer co-ordinator at the Xerxes Cup as well as Tournament Deputy Director at the Lord Dorchester Cup. I pioneered the use of loot bags as a judging incentive, which, I feel, was a huge part of our successful NorthAms bid. Incidentally, I will be Tournament Co-Director for NorthAms, which will probably be the best one ever.
For those of you who don't know me well, I am full of enthusiasm, energy and dedication to CUDS. My extreme love for all things CUDS would be an absolute asset to the position of VP External.
Here's a little bit about what I want to do... I admit, I'm not entirely clear on the distinction between VPI and VPX. I understand, however, the specific duties in the realm of VPX, and I will go above and beyond expectations concerning those. There are a few things that I want to change in CUDS overall, though.
1) Visibility on campus and in the community CUDS has been really visible on campus this year, but most of that has been relatively negative. I propose that we strengthen ties with campus media, especially The Charlatan, to ensure that we get the publicity we deserve.
For example: All of Carleton, and all of Ottawa, knew when the Ravens won the national basketball championship. We have the best debater in North America. Who knew about that? Let's get The Charlatan, and maybe even the Citizen, to cover our successes. Let's call the Rogers Community Cruiser during Xerxes. Let's get ourselves out there. Let's get NorthAms in the news. It's a pretty big deal.
I also want to see some more show debates, both on- and off-campus. Bringing in guest speakers is nice, but showing off what we can do is better.
2) Running the best NorthAms ever
Part of next year's success will come with running the North American Debate Championships. This, as I have mentioned before, is a big deal. I'm really excited. As Tournament Co-Director, I want to make sure that the rest of Carleton, and the rest of the city, knows what's going on.
3) Ties with EDS and FDS Sure, U of O is our rival in every other sport, but it's not the case in debating. We already have a really close relationship with EDS and, to a lesser degree, FDS, but let's make it stronger. Our joint Novice Training Day is fun, as is Debatathon and Panda, but let's do more. I suggest show debates between schools (how fun would that be?) where we clobber them. Perhaps also some Panda-like debate-offs during the slow tournament season. Maybe even a mini Pro-Am tournament.
4) Training lots of novii I want to see aggressive recruitment. I want Xerxes to become a recruitment tool. I will personally work the table at the Club Fair during frosh week. This should all be obvious. We hear over and over again that "CUDS has a retention problem." Let's change that by working extra-hard to make sure that everyone feels comfortable in the club...
5) Female presence within the club Part of the negative press that CUDS has been getting is due to a small female presence within the club. Having a female face on CUDS's executive is part of the process needed to have a stronger female presence. I remember my first couple of meetings with CUDS. There were few women and, I admit, it was a bit intimidating. I have a vested interest in making sure that we try our best to attract, and keep, female novii.
I hope you all consider what I have to say. As I said when I ran for Novice Rep in October, I'm in love with debating and debaters and I will do everything in my power to help CUDS be successful.
Love and loot bags,
Blair
2.7 Vice President French/Francais, Alexander Grinton
Version anglais suivirai. English version to follow.
Moi, Alexandre Grinton, voudrait annoncer ma candidature pour le VP Francais.
La base sur laquelle je cours a trois piliers simples comme suit :
1) Je suis qualifié. Au delà de la compétence nécessaire de base d'être à l'aise en français, j'ai beaucoup d'autres qualifications qui me rendent parfait pour cette position. Parmi ceux qui sont ces j'ai beaucoup de conduite et d'expérience d'organisation, y compris une expérience gestionnaire et ma participation continue en tant que officier dans la marine. Le dernier me fournissant beaucoup d'expérience continuelle comme officer, mais également précédemment comme communicateur comme lequel j'ai organise des series de communications et des réseaux. J'ai aussi passé six mois à bord du HMCS Tecumseh en tant qu'auteur d'un Cox'n que le directeur financier pour les rangs juniors, dont les deux me fournissant beaucoup de chances de faciliter en améliorant les systèmes internes de bateaux.
2) Représentation.
Un espoir que j'en a, c'est de donner une voix dans les côtés de la Science et de technologie de Carleton au commite executive. Il est évident que nous ayons besoin de plus de recrutement pour le club, mais ce que je voudrais fournir est un aspect visé à ceci. Actuellement le club a la participation très petite de la science et de technologie, qui est d'être due prévu à la tendance franc les matières d'être du côté politique, et ainsi je regarde pour améliorer notre recrutement en science et en machinant des corps enseignant pendant qu'une voix de la science dans un effort à se relient plus facilement aux membres éventuels chez ces corps enseignant aussi bien que pouvoir les atteindre plus facilement par arrangement quelles classes pour aller aussi bien avoir accès plus facile à pouvoir parler à ces groupes.
3) Améliorations du côté français du notre le club. Je voudrais également regarder apportant deux améliorations simples au côté français du club. Tout d'abord, il est tout à fait évident que la discussion française reçoit moins d'attention que le côté anglais, et alors qu'il n'est pas probable que ceci change, l'aspect français a besoin considérablement de plus. Particulièrement pendant la deuxième moitié de la saison, quand les tournois français de discussion s'approchent, nous ont besoin de plus de discussions de pratique plutôt alors qu'un rapide fourre la session avant les ressortissants. Ceci peut simplement venir de diviser le club en deux salles de seperate un peu plus souvent, ou même de avoir une réunion additionnelle une fois par semaine. La deuxième amélioration est auussi au sujet du recrutement, parce que, étant à Ottawa, il y a une population de langue française significative autour de nous, et j'estime que nous pourrions facilement soulever la participation de club en montrant notre côté français. Quelque chose aussi simple qu'une discussion française d'exposition serait une excellente démonstration de CUDS à la communauté d'étudiant de Carleton.
J'espère que c'a été assez pour vous montrer que je suis le candidat le plus évident pour ce positition, mais si quelques autres questions se posent je suis fluent en français, anglais, le code Morse et d'une manière plus importante l'email.
English version:
I, Alexander Grinton, would like to announce my candidacy for VP French.
The basis on which I am running has three simple pillars as follows:
1) I am qualified. Beyond the basic necessary skill of being fluent in french, I have many other qualifications that make me perfect for this position. Among those being that I have much leadership and organizational experience, including managerial experience and my ongoing involvement as an officer in the Navy. The latter providing me with much experience currently as an officer, but also previously as a communicator in which I spent much time organizing communications and networks. I also spent six months aboard the HMCS Tecumseh as a Coxn's Writer the financial executive for the junior ranks mess, both of which providing me with many chances to aid in improving the ships internal systems.
2) Representation. One thing I hope to provide to the executive committee is a voice within the Science and Engineering sides of Carleton. It is obvious that we need more recruitment for the club, but what I would like to provide is a targeted aspect to this. Currently the club has very little science and engineering involvement, which is to be expected due to the tendency fr the topics to be on the political side, and so I am looking to improve our recruitment in the science and engineering faculties as a science voice in an effort to more easily relate to the prospective members within these faculties as well as be able to reach them more easily by understanding what classes to go to as well have easier access to be able to speak to these groups.
3) Improvements on the french side of our the club. I would also like to look at making two simple improvements to the french side of the club. First of all, it is quite obvious that the french debating receives a god deal less attention then the english side, and while it is not likely that this will change, the french aspect does need considerably more. Especially during the second half of the season, as the french debate tournaments are approaching, we need more practice debates rather then a quick cram session before the nationals. This may simply come from dividing the club into two separate rooms a little more often, or even having an additional meeting once a week. The second improvement is once again about recruitment, because, being in Ottawa, there is a significant french speaking population around us, and I feel that we could easily raise club involvement by showing our french side. Something as simple as a french show debate would be an excellent demonstration of CUDS to the Carleton student community.
I am hoping that this has been enough to show you that I am the most obvious candidate for this positition, but should some other questions arise I am fluent in french, english, morse code and most importantly email.
Sincèrement; Sincerely;
Grinton, Alexander
2.8 Vice President French/Francais, Yannick Veilleux-LePage
Relevant Experience and Assets:
- Native Francophone with high proficiency in written and spoken French.
- I am Currently CUDS VPF - Won public speaking French Nats 2007 - Broke Semi-Finals. French Nats 2007 - Won 1st place and top speaker at Western French Tournement 2007 - Broke Semi-Finals, French Nats 2006
- President of my high school parliamentary debate club - President of my high school model UN club. - It is also very important to note that one of the main reason we created this position was to facilitate the communication between French club. This requires a very high level of French proficiency which only I posses at the present time.
Plans for the club :
- Marie-Anne (FDS Prez) and I, have been discussing and studying the possibility of holding regular joint meeting between French debaters and FDS. The venues would alternate between Ottawa U and Carleton in order to maximized the amount of members and possibility of holding rounds.
- The past two years have given me the opportunity to create good relationship with members of the French Dep. On numerous occasions have I had formals and informal meeting with Doutrelepont (Chair) and Khordoc (Assistant-Chair and my directed reading advisor) regarding the club. I would like to use these contacts to further a couple of projects.
1) I would like to host high quality French round with invited guest from the French dep. These guests would include prof and TAs, hopefully they will not only enjoy this but will be able to increase the profile of the club in their classroom and possible host in round debate class provided that we give them some basic rule training.
2) I have been approached for a Ta position for next year. This position would allow me to host numerous in class rounds and increase the profile of the club that would be highly useful for recruiting.
3)This year I approached the French department for funding. After our victories at BC, chance of funding next year are fairly high providing that we continue to maintain positive relationship with the department
-As most people know. I am on the organization committee for the 2008 French National Championship and will serve as Chief Adjudicator pending bid approval. This will raise the profile of CUDS on the entire French circuit of CUSID. This will also allow me to have a first hand say in tournament policy that will help maximize the club participation.
Accomplishments in 2006-2007
-I would probably start by saying that the creation of the VPF was an accomplishment by it self and was reserved very positively by other clubs.
-Since last year. Carleton has broken at every single French tournament it has participated in. We have also won UBC Western French and won the 2007 French Nat public speaking. This has for effect to raise our profile as a club who is taking French debate seriously
-We have started getting funding from the French department.
-Our participation in tournaments has double. We when to twice as many tournaments this year and sent twice as many debaters to French Nats.
- Securing the proxies from Poly (unfortunately was not sent to use on time by the poly exec) and the proxies from FDS. This one proxy would have play a crucial role in securing our NorAms bid
Yannick.
I will be more then happy to answer any questions.
|