I agree with you Marita I like the change James made.
Clarice
Albert Einstein once said that “Insanity is doing the same thing over and
over again and expecting different results.”
On Sun, Jul 27, 2025, 6:17 p.m. Marita Moll <mmoll(a)ca.inter.net> wrote:
Thanks James. Definitely an improvement.
Marita
On 2025-07-27 9:13 a.m., James Van Leeuwen wrote:
Hi Marita,
your suggestion works just fine, but I offer the following suggested
revision in blue to help emphasize the community context:
*Emphasize the importance of community internet infrastructure and
community decisionmaking processes to connecting the unconnected (...)*
Regards,
James
On Jul 27, 2025, at 5:06 AM, Marita Moll <mmoll(a)ca.inter.net>
<mmoll(a)ca.inter.net> wrote:
Hi advisors. I know it is summer and we are all trying to step away from
the internet grind. Unfortunately, all these international processes don't
take a vacation. So, just sending a reminder to let me know if you are okay
with the following wording suggestions to the Canadian stakeholder position
in the WSIS+20 negotiations.
Marita
On 2025-07-21 8:50 p.m., Marita Moll wrote:
Hello advisors. You might remember that ISED and GAC held 6 thematic
meetings over the last 6 months to develop a Canadian stakeholder vision
document to help inform the Canadian position at the WSIS+20 negotiations
later this year. I was part of this informal working group where I did what
I could to promote the ideas TC members had developed in some of our work
on the questionnaires late last year. Attached is the first draft of the
vision document which captures the key messages from these meetings. I have
looked at it and find it to be a reasonable outcome of the discussions. But
this is a draft and feedback will be considered. I am considering asking
for a minor revision of the piece under *Indigenous Connectivity and
Community Networks *which currently reads:
-
Emphasize the importance of community networks in creating an enabling
environment to connect the unconnected (directly related to WSIS Action
Line 6).
Not much room for change here. We have be very clear and concise. I was
going to offer the following suggestion as a rewording:
*Emphasize the importance of community internet infrastructure and
decisionmaking processes to connect the unconnected (...)*
This wording is actually from our response to the ITU questionnaire and I
think the current reference to community networks is terribly vague in this
context.
Any thoughts? Deadline: July 31
Marita
_______________________________________________
Tcadvisors mailing list -- tcadvisors(a)lists.ncf.ca
To unsubscribe send an email to tcadvisors-leave(a)lists.ncf.ca
_______________________________________________
Advisors mailing list -- advisors(a)tc.ca
To unsubscribe send an email to advisors-leave(a)tc.ca
_______________________________________________
Tcadvisors mailing list -- tcadvisors(a)lists.ncf.ca
To unsubscribe send an email to tcadvisors-leave(a)lists.ncf.ca