9:25 a.m.
Thanks. Just wondering if you went into the doc. and added ISOC Manitoba
to the comments (you can do that) or I don't mind doing it.
Great to have a better Canadian showing
Marita
On 2025-07-10 9:00 p.m., Joel Templeman wrote:
Hi Marita,
ISOC Manitoba is in. Thanks for the heads up. I’ve added Pierre-Jean
and Franca here.
*Joel Templeman, CD, MPA, MEd*
Executive Director
Internet Society Manitoba Chapter
431-999-3953
joel.templeman(a)internetsocietymanitoba.ca
PastedGraphic-1.png
> On Jul 10, 2025, at 7:14 AM, Marita Moll <mmoll(a)ca.inter.net> wrote:
>
> Hello advisors. The statement linked below is very aligned with the
> principles we developed. I think we should sign on. Easy thing to do.
> Deadline is July 15th.
>
> There has been lots of activity in this area, with an IGF in Norway
> dedicated to the subject, and current discussions going on in Geneva.
> But I have stepped back from it all since the completion of the
> consultations with the coalition organized by GAC and ISED. I felt
> our participation at the level was our best shot at any influence.
> The rest is up to the people on the ground. However, showing
> solidarity by signing on to statements like this is still possible. I
> see the Canadian Youth group has signed on. No other Canadian group yet.
>
> Joel, I wonder if ISOC Winnipeg would consider signing on.
>
> Marita
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Joint Statement WSIS+20 Review
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 19:51:17 +0000
> From: info@youthigf.de<info@youthigf.de>
> To: info@tc.ca<info@tc.ca>
>
>
>
> Dear Team of Telecommunities Canada,
>
> My name is Claire Patzig, and I am reaching out on behalf of the
> German Youth IGF, alongside other supporting NRIs and civil society
> organizations.
>
> In the current version of the IGF elements paper, several core
> aspects - namely multistakeholder approaches, the role of the IGF,
> the role of NRIs, and the principle of technology neutrality - are
> either missing or insufficiently represented. At the Open
> Consultation in Oslo these concerns were widely raised. We strongly
> believe that a joint contribution from NRIs and CSOs across the globe
> would carry significantly more weight and visibility than individual
> statements.
>
> To address this, we have drafted a concise joint statement
> highlighting the key points we collectively wish to see included in
> the final version of the paper.
>
> You can access the statement here:
>
>
_https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K7km90ZWqc-EqDN14ULR4roM_NqXruhePz6R...
>
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K7km90ZWqc-EqDN14ULR4roM_NqXruhePz6R0...
>
> Our aim is to submit this joint statement as a written contribution
> by*15 July*. We are aware that the short timeline differs from the
> usual inclusive processes. However, if the content aligns with your
> chapter's ongoing priorities, we warmly invite you to*sign the
> statement*. If you'd like to exchange views or need further
> clarification, we would be happy to arrange a conversation.
>
> We kindly ask you to review the draft and let us know by*10 July* if
> you would like to be listed as a supporting organization. Your input
> will be essential in ensuring this joint contribution is both
> inclusive and impactful.
>
>
> Warm regards,
> Claire Patzig
>
