CH TSO is out of the office.
by CH TSO
I will respond to your message when I return.
This notice is generated in response to your mail:
From: ccglrit-gcclrit-bounces(a)lists.ncf.ca
Subject: [Ccglrit-gcclrit] ad hoc working group (LRIT)
Date: 15.05.2007 9:53:58 AM
18 years, 1 month
comments
by Saeid Khorsandi
Dear Tracy / Sam
Following to my last day email , please find in below some comments
about last draft documents LRIT .
If possible for you , please refer it to relevant working group ( or in
plenary) for consideration and inform me about the results
Best regards
Saeid Khorsandi
Senior expert of marine communication
Ports and shipping organization - Iran
GENERAL COMMENTS ( To Mr. SAM RYAN ):
1- In order to do some arrangments between all working groups and
also have a same policy in common points , I suggest all working
group's chairmans have a meeting about the decisions at the end of each
day . For example in last meeting ( third Ad Hoc ) , there was two
different views in IDE-COMM and BILLING COSTING groups concerning the
method of transaction messages as a flag state and necessity for LRIT
info From ships associated with DC go out and back through IDE
2- In the last session ( third meeting ) output document of IDE-COMM
included some important comments which have been written in left side of
each paragraphs or tables , but in last draft document we couldn' t find
any feed back or result of these comments . Please inform all members
about results of discussion in these comments via the reflector.
OTHER COMMENTS
1- According to part 10.3 of performance standards the IDE have
continuous access to DDP . But in the system architecture figure in the
Performance Standards does not have an arrow linking the Data
Distribution Plan to the International LRIT Data Exchange . Also in
figure 2 of draft document for communication, there is a direct link
between DDP and IDE . This matter should be considered in IDE and DDP
working groups.
2- About the access to information as a Port State , as far as you
know a Port State request is always triggered by a Notice of Arrival but
who is responsible for sending the NOA and how? For your information
currently the format of NOA's are different around the world and being
issued by the agent of ships to the destination port which the
contracting government doesn't have any information about the ship
destination.
3- According to performance standards , ships as soon as passing
any country's sea borders ( for example port or coastal state borders)
must automatically be configured according to DDP via their DC .
How DCs are being informed , and find out their ships are passing the
countries geographical Sea borders ? Maybe ship born equipment inform
the DC but in this case the DDP should be installed in the ship's
terminal !!! If DC has discovered a match , in this case ships should be
configured in minimum interval for finding the exact time of border
passing ( and the billing will be raised)
4- In last draft document of international data center :
a. In part 1.2.2.2 term " identification" must be changed to " ship
borne equipment Id." According to table 1 . It should be distinguished
what is this " ship borne equipment Id "?
b. As have been written in this document "IDC operator" means the
individual responsible for the daily operation and maintenance of the
International LRIT Data Centre , but the qualification of this operators
and level of education should be considered by the working group ( IDC
group)
c. In part 1.2.3.2 term " the present Performance standards" must
be changed to " the present technical spec."
d. Part 3.2.1.2 is not needed.
18 years, 1 month
Malta meeting
by Majid Moshtagh Kahnamo-ee
Dear Tracy
With apologies , I'll not be able to attend in the Malta meeting , due
to organizational problems .
but I would like to receive all output information and reports .
Best Regards
Majid Moshtagh Kahnamouei
Ports and shipping organization - Iran
18 years, 1 month
Costing and billing standard
by Peverett, Tracy
As the Word version I sent is almost 2M, I am sending a smaller, pdf
version (which you may receive first)
With apologies for the considerable delay, attached please find the
first draft of the costing and billing standard. As you will see, it is
a very rough draft based on inputs from the London ad hoc meeting and
related discussions, as well as outcomes of the subsequent COMSAR
meeting. Titles for a number of issues raised but not discussed have
been inserted as placeholders to help guide discussions next week.
Looking forward to lively discussions next week. Those of you
unfortunately not able to attend are, as always, invited to share your
comments on this and any of the other documents via the reflector.
An updated version of this and all other specifications will be
circulated via the reflector as soon as possible following the Malta
meeting to provide time for inputs prior to the meeting in Hamburg.
Best regards
Tracy
Tracy Peverett
Senior Policy Analyst
Fleet Directorate
Canadian Coast Guard
Tel: 1-613-990-4046
Fax: 1-613-998-3255
e-mail: peverettT(a)dfo-mpo.gc.ca
18 years, 1 month
Malta meeting
by Saeid Khorsandi
Dear Tracy
With apologies , I would like to inform you and all members of Ad Hoc
Engineering group that , I'll not be able to attend in the Malta meeting
, due to organizational problems , but I would like to receive all
output information and reports .
Meanwhile I will send some comments about last draft documents , via the
reflector , tomorrow .
Many thanks
Saeid Khorsandi
Senior expert of marine communications
Ports and shipping organization - Iran
18 years, 1 month
Ad Hoc Meeting
by Gugu Ndebele
Kindly forward me the information for the venue of the meeting and the
recommended Hotels
Regards
Gugu
LEGAL DISCLAIMER & CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message contains
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, you are hereby notified that you must not read, disseminate,
copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the Department of Transport mail
administrator at admin(a)dot.gov.za immediately. Any views expressed in
this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender
specifically states them to be the view of the Department of Transport.
While every care has been taken in preparing this document, no
representation, warranty or undertaking (express or implied) is given
and no responsibility nor liability is accepted by the Department of
Transport as to the accuracy of the information contained herein, that
the mail is virus-free, or for any loss arising from reliance on it.
18 years, 2 months
Draft costing and billing standard
by Peverett, Tracy
With apologies for the considerable delay, attached please find the
first draft of the costing and billing standard. As you will see, it is
a very rough draft based on inputs from the London ad hoc meeting and
related discussions, as well as outcomes of the subsequent COMSAR
meeting. Titles for a number of issues raised but not discussed have
been inserted as placeholders to help guide discussions next week.
Looking forward to lively discussions next week. Those of you
unfortunately not able to attend are, as always, invited to share your
comments on this and any of the other documents via the reflector.
An updated version of this and all other specifications will be
circulated via the reflector as soon as possible following the Malta
meeting to provide time for inputs prior to the meeting in Hamburg.
Best regards
Tracy
Tracy Peverett
Senior Policy Analyst
Canadian Coast Guard
Tel: 1-613-990-4046
Fax: 1-613-998-3255
e-mail: peverettT(a)dfo-mpo.gc.ca
18 years, 2 months
