[Ccglrit-gcclrit] FW: Revised Draft LRIT Costing and BillingStandard

Hello Saeid This is to confirm that I received your comments, however they do not appear to have been received by all on the reflector. For that reason I have forwarded your e-mail directly to Bill Cairns, and am resending your comments to the wider reflector as well. I am also requesting, by means of this e-mail, that my colleague John Bertorelli check the reflector to try to determine why some messages are not getting through. Best regards Tracy Tracy Peverett Senior Policy Analyst Canadian Coast Guard Tel: 1-613-990-4046 Fax: 1-613-998-3255 e-mail: peverettT(a)dfo-mpo.gc.ca ________________________________ From: Saeid Khorsandi [mailto:khorsandi@PSO.IR] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 7:10 AM To: ccglrit-gcclrit(a)lists.ncf.ca Cc: Peverett, Tracy Subject: RE: [Ccglrit-gcclrit] Revised Draft LRIT Costing and Billing Standard Hi Bill /All Following to our conversation within the Hamburg meeting about the NOA I would like to inform you that as far as you said in last meeting the NOA is a notice outside of the LRIT system but according to part 4.4 of Draft Guidance on Setting up and Maintaining the LRIT Data Distribution Plan : " Paragraph 16.1.3 contains the standing order for port State tracking. If the distance from a port is used, then the information from section 11.2.6 must be used in conjunction with this standing order. Although this is a standing order, a Notice of Arrival (NOA) must still be transmitted by the Contracting Government through its Data Centre to the destination Data Centre. The information contained in the standing order should include, but is not limited to, the following: ship name, IMO ship identification number, vessel's flag state and the distance from the Contracting Government's port " About the access to information as a Port State , as far as you know a Port State request is always triggered by a Notice of Arrival but who is responsible for sending the NOA and how? and who will be responsible for confirming access to the information ? Is there any unique format for NOA in the LRIT system? For your information currently the format of NOA are different around the world and being issued by the agent of ships to the destination port which the contracting government doesn't have any information about the ship destination . Regards Khorsandi Senior expert of marine communication P.S.O - Iran ________________________________ From: ccglrit-gcclrit-bounces(a)lists.ncf.ca [mailto:ccglrit-gcclrit-bounces@lists.ncf.ca] On Behalf Of Peverett, Tracy Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:23 PM To: ccglrit-gcclrit(a)lists.ncf.ca Cc: hhesse(a)imo.org; ncharala(a)imo.org Subject: Re: [Ccglrit-gcclrit] Revised Draft LRIT Costing and Billing Standard Hello, attached please find the following two documents: 1. IDC spec 2. Annex on technical criteria for location of the IDC Still to come today are the Comms, IDE and testing specs. DDP update will be circulated next week. A reminder that comments on all documents must be received no later than June 29. Also, given ungoing problems that some of you have been experiencing with the reflector, it would be appreciated if any comments you might have on this or any of the other documents be sent to the reflector with a cc directly to me at peverettt(a)dfo-mpo.gc.ca <mailto:peverettt@dfo-mpo.gc.ca> I will respond to all e-mails confirming that the message has been received via the reflector; if not I will ensure that comments are distributed to the reflector from this end. If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact me directly at peverettt(a)dfo-mpo.gc.ca <mailto:peverettt@dfo-mpo.gc.ca> Best regards, Tracy Tracy Peverett Senior Policy Analyst Canadian Coast Guard Tel: 1-613-990-4046 Fax: 1-613-998-3255 e-mail: peverettT(a)dfo-mpo.gc.ca