Wednesday Evening Ride March 24th
by Daniel Brousseau
Hey everyone,
Tomorrow evening shall be nice and not too windy.
Kate Blonde and I shall be going for a ride leaving from Competitive
Edge Gym (80 Keil Dr S) 6PM
Will be riding to the bridge and back (20km) and will be back before
sunset..
If you are interested, you are certainly welcome to join us.
Dan
14 years, 7 months
Re: [CKcycle] CKcycle Digest, Vol 9, Issue 46
by brad.blonde@plantpioneer.com
1:00 will be fine
Brad
Sent wirelessly from my BlackBerry device on the Bell network.
Envoyé sans fil par mon terminal mobile BlackBerry sur le réseau de Bell.
-----Original Message-----
From: "ckcycle-request(a)lists.ncf.ca" <ckcycle-request(a)lists.ncf.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:59:26
To: ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca<ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca>
Subject: CKcycle Digest, Vol 9, Issue 46
Send CKcycle mailing list submissions to
ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.ncf.ca/mailman/listinfo/ckcycle
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ckcycle-request(a)lists.ncf.ca
You can reach the person managing the list at
ckcycle-owner(a)lists.ncf.ca
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CKcycle digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Tuesday Time Trials (andrew flanagan)
2. Re: Sunday Brunch (Ann McKenzie)
3. Jersey / Shorts Moc up. (Daniel Brousseau)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:57:19 +0000
From: andrew flanagan <atf22(a)hotmail.com>
Subject: [CKcycle] Tuesday Time Trials
To: <ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca>
Message-ID: <BLU104-W5AE92D98FBFA49F68CBECBC260(a)phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
If anyone wants to do some time trials i'm organizing a weekly TT every Tuesday night until the Tuesday group rides from Smithcycle start up again. They will be timed, i'll keep track of records.
for more info visit sarniatimetrials.blogspot.com or check out the facebook group by searching sarnia time trials.
Andrew
_________________________________________________________________
IM on the go with Messenger on your phone
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9712960
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncf.ca/pipermail/ckcycle/attachments/20100323/746a91c8/attac...>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ann McKenzie <sydkneeca(a)yahoo.ca>
Subject: Re: [CKcycle] Sunday Brunch
To: Chatham-Kent Commmunity Cycling Group <ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca>
Message-ID: <57848.87397.qm(a)web53003.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I just might have to go to t this......If I can find the place.? LOL
Ann
________________________________
From: Rand MacIntosh <rmacintosh(a)campbell.toyota.ca>
To: Chatham-Kent Commmunity Cycling Group <ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca>
Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 12:36:44 PM
Subject: [CKcycle] Sunday Brunch
for those breakfast lovers
?
our?last brunch was a big hit
?
Rand MacIntosh
519-352-4740
1-866-739-2237
cell 519-355-5074
rmacintosh(a)campbell.toyota.ca
Mon, Wed, Fri 9-5, Tues, Thurs till 7,
please call for Saturday schedule
-----Original Message-----
From: Granite Club [mailto:granite@ciaccess.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 12:06 PM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Subject: Sunday Brunch
Members please tell your friends and family about our great Brunch.
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4968 (20100323)__________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4968 (20100323)__________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________________________________________________________________
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncf.ca/pipermail/ckcycle/attachments/20100323/ef86fd11/attac...>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:58:32 -0400
From: Daniel Brousseau <fh511(a)ncf.ca>
Subject: [CKcycle] Jersey / Shorts Moc up.
To: Chatham-Kent Commmunity Cycling Group <ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca>
Message-ID: <4BA955A8.6010403(a)ncf.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Hey everyone,
Received the MOC UP today while I was in the office.
Tell me what you think? also the suggestion are welcomed.
I shall be responding to the designer when I get back home from my
training ride tomorrow.
There is a few things in it that bug me also missing the rear pocket
sponsors but the designer through this together as a draft.
===============================
For the "SLEEVE" sections we are looking for the logos to be length wise
so they can be read while a person looking at frontal of jersey like
attached original "image002.jpg".
For the "BACK" section;
- the TekSavvy logo would be under ours "CK" and needs to be the "TSI
Full Logo_vectorized" logo with website and contact number like attached
original "image002.jpg"
- Also the Smith Cycle are looking at getting their number under the
logo like attached original "image002.jpg"
The SkinSuits also need to display the "BACK POCKET" sponsors.
For the main CK Logo on the front and back, will the letter section be
blacked out like the other letters in the words "Community Cycling" part?
Beyond that all is great.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 51587 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncf.ca/pipermail/ckcycle/attachments/20100323/ce695141/attac...>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NikoJersey.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 91757 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncf.ca/pipermail/ckcycle/attachments/20100323/ce695141/attac...>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NikoShorts.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 73222 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncf.ca/pipermail/ckcycle/attachments/20100323/ce695141/attac...>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CKcycle mailing list
CKcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca
http://lists.ncf.ca/mailman/listinfo/ckcycle
End of CKcycle Digest, Vol 9, Issue 46
**************************************
14 years, 7 months
Jersey / Shorts Moc up.
by Daniel Brousseau
Hey everyone,
Received the MOC UP today while I was in the office.
Tell me what you think? also the suggestion are welcomed.
I shall be responding to the designer when I get back home from my
training ride tomorrow.
There is a few things in it that bug me also missing the rear pocket
sponsors but the designer through this together as a draft.
===============================
For the "SLEEVE" sections we are looking for the logos to be length wise
so they can be read while a person looking at frontal of jersey like
attached original "image002.jpg".
For the "BACK" section;
- the TekSavvy logo would be under ours "CK" and needs to be the "TSI
Full Logo_vectorized" logo with website and contact number like attached
original "image002.jpg"
- Also the Smith Cycle are looking at getting their number under the
logo like attached original "image002.jpg"
The SkinSuits also need to display the "BACK POCKET" sponsors.
For the main CK Logo on the front and back, will the letter section be
blacked out like the other letters in the words "Community Cycling" part?
Beyond that all is great.
14 years, 7 months
Re: [CKcycle] Jersey / Shorts Moc up.
by Dan Brousseau
As many Smith Cycle's. Hehehe
** Envoye/Sent via mobile **
Daniel Brousseau
Soutien Technique Bilingue
TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
877-357-2889
www.TekSavvy.com
----- Original Message -----
From:"Jennifer Johnston" <jennjohnston10(a)gmail.com>
To:"Chatham-Kent Commmunity Cycling Group" <ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca>
Sent:Mar 23, 2010 8:19 PM
Subject:Re: [CKcycle] Jersey / Shorts Moc up.
How many "tell savvy's" can one fit on a shirt?????
Sent from my iPhone
On 2010-03-23, at 7:58 PM, Daniel Brousseau <fh511(a)ncf.ca> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Received the MOC UP today while I was in the office.
>
> Tell me what you think? also the suggestion are welcomed.
> I shall be responding to the designer when I get back home from my
> training ride tomorrow.
>
> There is a few things in it that bug me also missing the rear pocket
> sponsors but the designer through this together as a draft.
> ===============================
> For the "SLEEVE" sections we are looking for the logos to be length
> wise so they can be read while a person looking at frontal of jersey
> like attached original "image002.jpg".
>
> For the "BACK" section;
> - the TekSavvy logo would be under ours "CK" and needs to be the
> "TSI Full Logo_vectorized" logo with website and contact number like
> attached original "image002.jpg"
> - Also the Smith Cycle are looking at getting their number under the
> logo like attached original "image002.jpg"
>
> The SkinSuits also need to display the "BACK POCKET" sponsors.
>
> For the main CK Logo on the front and back, will the letter section
> be blacked out like the other letters in the words "Community
> Cycling" part?
>
> Beyond that all is great.
>
> <image002.jpg>
> <NikoJersey.jpg>
> <NikoShorts.jpg>
> _______________________________________________
> CKcycle mailing list
> CKcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca
> http://lists.ncf.ca/mailman/listinfo/ckcycle
_______________________________________________
CKcycle mailing list
CKcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca
http://lists.ncf.ca/mailman/listinfo/ckcycle
14 years, 7 months
Sunday Brunch
by Rand MacIntosh
for those breakfast lovers
our last brunch was a big hit
Rand MacIntosh
519-352-4740
1-866-739-2237
cell 519-355-5074
rmacintosh(a)campbell.toyota.ca
Mon, Wed, Fri 9-5, Tues, Thurs till 7,
please call for Saturday schedule
-----Original Message-----
From: Granite Club [mailto:granite@ciaccess.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 12:06 PM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Subject: Sunday Brunch
Members please tell your friends and family about our great Brunch.
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4968 (20100323) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
14 years, 7 months
Tuesday Time Trials
by andrew flanagan
If anyone wants to do some time trials i'm organizing a weekly TT every Tuesday night until the Tuesday group rides from Smithcycle start up again. They will be timed, i'll keep track of records.
for more info visit sarniatimetrials.blogspot.com or check out the facebook group by searching sarnia time trials.
Andrew
_________________________________________________________________
IM on the go with Messenger on your phone
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9712960
14 years, 7 months
Re: [CKcycle] CKcycle Digest, Vol 9, Issue 43
by James Lively
For clarification, the notice came from John Sigurjonsson, Cycle
Chatham-Kent. The other people around the table at the meeting some being
members of Cycle Chatham-Kent, are members of the Active Communities
Steering Committee, a committee of municipal council. As part of the ACSC
they represent various interests; active transportation of which cycling is
a major part; trails and the public at large. The two manager/owners of the
local cycle stores were also at the meeting.
I will also add that while John S. is voicing valid concerns over the bike
rack issue, the other members around the table have other views of
priorities that need to be addressed.
As a member of the ACSC, any opinions/comments on the issues facing cyclists
in CK. you have will be appreciated.
James.
-----Original Message-----
From: ckcycle-bounces(a)lists.ncf.ca [mailto:ckcycle-bounces@lists.ncf.ca] On
Behalf Of ckcycle-request(a)lists.ncf.ca
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 6:41 PM
To: ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca
Subject: CKcycle Digest, Vol 9, Issue 43
Send CKcycle mailing list submissions to
ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.ncf.ca/mailman/listinfo/ckcycle
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ckcycle-request(a)lists.ncf.ca
You can reach the person managing the list at
ckcycle-owner(a)lists.ncf.ca
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CKcycle digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. [Fwd: March 11 meeting followup] (Daniel Brousseau)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:40:36 -0400
From: Daniel Brousseau <fh511(a)ncf.ca>
Subject: [CKcycle] [Fwd: March 11 meeting followup]
To: Chatham-Kent Commmunity Cycling Group <ckcycle(a)lists.ncf.ca>
Message-ID: <4BA6A064.4050201(a)ncf.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Just got this update from the Chatham Cycling Counsel
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: March 11 meeting followup
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:56:50 -0400
From: Member Services CCK <memberservices(a)cycleck.ca>
We could have continued our meeting all night and not run out of issues
to discuss :-). Here are some updates on what we discussed:
1) 2009 cost of pavement markings: The municipal website shows that
contract awarded at approx $48,500 which presumable was charged to our
$750,000 2009 budget.
2) Priority projects and costings: Attached is a table listing the
priority projects we identified and my cost estimates based on standard
consultant's cost tables and also showing how the list relates to the
funding available. It would be great if we could get all this done in
2010, especially if we could avoid the big cost hit for Victoria Ave.!
3) *Bike* rack costs: The report going to Council Monday night
confirms the cost of post-and-ring racks at $181.65, or $90.83/bike space.
*However, there is a reference to "200 racks for $60,000" later in Leo's
report and Tom Beaton mentioned those figures at the January ACSC
meeting. Does that mean that installation is expected to cost $120/unit?
In my humble opinion that would be nuts!*
*There is no mention in Leo's report of the project being spread over 5
years as indicated in the RFQ.*
*There is no mention of another RFQ being issued for inverted-U racks as
agreed to by Don Shropshire at the February ACSC meeting.*
*The ACSC is a party to this deal, but is not being treated as a full
partner. *
-Did the ACSC approve the details of the $100,000
program that was the basis for the TDM grant application? Leo has said
that the money will have to be spent as shown in the submission.
-Did you have any say in who was asked to bid on the
racks contract? None of the major suppliers of bike racks in Canada or
the USA were included and would almost certainly have had lower bids.
Toronto is installing 3000 post-and-rings in 2010 and their supplier
could probably run off another 100 for us at very low cost. Other
suppliers will have to retool to do this job.
-Does the ACSC know how the municipality is deciding
how many racks they need and at what locations? There are standard
guidelines agreed on by many municipalities that indicate how much bike
parking is needed for various type3s and sizes of property. John J
researched those guidelines. Is Administration using them or ignoring them?
-I know that the ACSC wasn't told that the RFQ
specifies 100 racks/yr over 5 years. When I emailed Don S about this he
replied: "While this issue was not discussed last night (Feb 16), the
Active Communities Steering Committee has in the past discussed the need
to maintain our momentum and move ahead with the roll out of the bike
rack program. While wanting to maintain a sense of urgency on this file
I am not concerned with our current rate of progress". That of course is
not his decision to make.
The ACSC was created to give Council and the community initiative,
advice, and action beyond what the municipality would get from staff
alone. That won't happen if the ACSC simply agrees to whatever staff
says or does. Initiatives from citizen members of the ACSC are needed
and must come in the form of motions that get passed and so become ACSC
policy. Anything short of that is just conversation
I believe that Leo, Don, and Laurel are trying to move this initiative
forward in a professional manner. That doesn't mean that they will
always have the right answers or the same level of commitment and sense
of urgency that the ACSC should bring. .Also, they are the interface
with their staff and with Council, and get push-back from both.
Sometimes it may be helpful to them to be able to go back to these
bodies and say
"I initially disagreed, but this is the ACSC decision".
Those at our March 11 meeting who are not ACSC members, and others
receiving copies of this email, are representative of the cycling
community you have been appointed to represent. They are counting on you.
Thanks for bearing with me on this. Best of luck at the ACSC meeting
Tuesday.
**Regards**
**John Sigurjonsson**
14 years, 7 months
[Fwd: March 11 meeting followup]
by Daniel Brousseau
Just got this update from the Chatham Cycling Counsel
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: March 11 meeting followup
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:56:50 -0400
From: Member Services CCK <memberservices(a)cycleck.ca>
We could have continued our meeting all night and not run out of issues
to discuss :-). Here are some updates on what we discussed:
1) 2009 cost of pavement markings: The municipal website shows that
contract awarded at approx $48,500 which presumable was charged to our
$750,000 2009 budget.
2) Priority projects and costings: Attached is a table listing the
priority projects we identified and my cost estimates based on standard
consultant's cost tables and also showing how the list relates to the
funding available. It would be great if we could get all this done in
2010, especially if we could avoid the big cost hit for Victoria Ave.!
3) *Bike* rack costs: The report going to Council Monday night
confirms the cost of post-and-ring racks at $181.65, or $90.83/bike space.
*However, there is a reference to "200 racks for $60,000" later in Leo's
report and Tom Beaton mentioned those figures at the January ACSC
meeting. Does that mean that installation is expected to cost $120/unit?
In my humble opinion that would be nuts!*
*There is no mention in Leo's report of the project being spread over 5
years as indicated in the RFQ.*
*There is no mention of another RFQ being issued for inverted-U racks as
agreed to by Don Shropshire at the February ACSC meeting.*
*The ACSC is a party to this deal, but is not being treated as a full
partner. *
-Did the ACSC approve the details of the $100,000
program that was the basis for the TDM grant application? Leo has said
that the money will have to be spent as shown in the submission.
-Did you have any say in who was asked to bid on the
racks contract? None of the major suppliers of bike racks in Canada or
the USA were included and would almost certainly have had lower bids.
Toronto is installing 3000 post-and-rings in 2010 and their supplier
could probably run off another 100 for us at very low cost. Other
suppliers will have to retool to do this job.
-Does the ACSC know how the municipality is deciding
how many racks they need and at what locations? There are standard
guidelines agreed on by many municipalities that indicate how much bike
parking is needed for various type3s and sizes of property. John J
researched those guidelines. Is Administration using them or ignoring them?
-I know that the ACSC wasn't told that the RFQ
specifies 100 racks/yr over 5 years. When I emailed Don S about this he
replied: "While this issue was not discussed last night (Feb 16), the
Active Communities Steering Committee has in the past discussed the need
to maintain our momentum and move ahead with the roll out of the bike
rack program. While wanting to maintain a sense of urgency on this file
I am not concerned with our current rate of progress". That of course is
not his decision to make.
The ACSC was created to give Council and the community initiative,
advice, and action beyond what the municipality would get from staff
alone. That won't happen if the ACSC simply agrees to whatever staff
says or does. Initiatives from citizen members of the ACSC are needed
and must come in the form of motions that get passed and so become ACSC
policy. Anything short of that is just conversation
I believe that Leo, Don, and Laurel are trying to move this initiative
forward in a professional manner. That doesn't mean that they will
always have the right answers or the same level of commitment and sense
of urgency that the ACSC should bring. .Also, they are the interface
with their staff and with Council, and get push-back from both.
Sometimes it may be helpful to them to be able to go back to these
bodies and say
"I initially disagreed, but this is the ACSC decision".
Those at our March 11 meeting who are not ACSC members, and others
receiving copies of this email, are representative of the cycling
community you have been appointed to represent. They are counting on you.
Thanks for bearing with me on this. Best of luck at the ACSC meeting
Tuesday.
**Regards**
**John Sigurjonsson**
14 years, 7 months
Jersey/Short Order
by Daniel Brousseau
OK so just got off the phone with Niko Apparel.
The ball is now in motion for the order to be completed and shipped to
for.......
April 30th' ish :-)
That is correct by the end of April or beginning of May.
Tuesday night I should have the MOC UP and shall be posting it here so
it can get everyone revved up.
Stay tuned for more info as it comes in.
Daniel
14 years, 7 months
Updated site http://tiny.cc/ckcycle
by Dan Brousseau
Have a peek at the Ck Cycle list site intro page :-)
http://tiny.cc/ckcycle
Tell me what you think... Need some starting dates too...
Tuesday Rides, all depends on Matt and the gang on that side.
Wednesday Rides April 14th was mentioned by Ann but could certainly start sooner (They could start now as there is enough time to ride 20km if you start at 6pm as we saw last night)
Sunday Rides.... can begin by March 27th
** All rides are weather permitting thus **
Working on the Posters with the same concept
14 years, 7 months